Harassing texts from an ex: preserving messages and context in France
Published on 25/09/2026
Free tool The fact log, ready to print Open the fact logHarassing texts from an ex describe an experience; the legal classification depends on the facts. This guide concerns French law and preserving a readable record, not diagnosing an offence.
In France, immediate danger is for 17 or 112, as explained in the official emergency directory. A digital file does not replace emergency help.
How many messages count as harassment?
A count alone is insufficient. The official guidance on malicious messages describes repetition and an intention to disturb someone's peace. Content and circumstances matter. A threat may also require separate assessment.
How can context be preserved?
| Reference | Information retained |
|---|---|
| Origin | Displayed number or account, without assuming identity |
| Timing | Date, time and time zone where relevant |
| Conversation | Earlier and later messages, including replies |
| File | Available original or export; reference to the working copy |
| Related event | Separately dated call, presence or observed consequence |
A cropped screenshot can hide context. Annotations belong in a separate working copy. Missing messages remain identified as missing; a recollection is not presented as an exact quotation. Keeping originals makes it possible to distinguish the underlying material from a later summary.
What does a message chronology establish?
Aridelle's free fact log links episodes to document references. It does not authenticate a sender, certify messages or decide whether a court will accept them.
A lawyer or a point-justice can advise on the particular circumstances. Main courante and complaint have different effects.